Forums

A child regularly swearing at a teacher - telephone the police?

Last post 24/12/10 at 11:21 by dinx67, 253 replies
Post started by MissedOpportunity on 13/12/10 at 19:16

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    141
    Posted by: autismuk 17/12/2010 at 07:09
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,080

    weebecka:
    Then I'm just lost, because I know who I am and what I did and somehow you've got the wrong impression.  Could you give me the post numbers?
     

    If you know this why did you not use your real persona when you first started posting ? What is your real persona ? 

    People get the 'wrong impression' partly because you are collecting material for an ATM presentation which you somehow forgot to mention until someone else found it out.

    weebecka:
    Okay.  I find it easier to say relevant things to specific situations.  This sounds like a very low attaining SEN class.

    Very low attaining SEN classes are usually much better, (what one might call genuine SEN rather than just yobism) but then they aren't the most challenging behaviour ones.

    Challenging behaviour children however are usually nowhere near C grades.

    weebecka:
    In this case it can be more appropriate to talk to students about their behaviour in class and, in some cases, to involve other students in the discussion

    Not practical in state schools often due to time pressures and sometimes compulsory curricula. Also won't have an effect on yobs who know what they are doing and why.

    weebecka:
    Expected modifications in behaviour should be small and frequently rewarded.

    Small behavioural changes in very challenging classes are not going to set the world on fire, and then you get into the 'well-done-Ryan-for-not-hitting-anyone-for-10-minutes-heres-a-prize' issue.

    weebecka:
    If discussing behaviour with a student when others can hear proves counterproductive, a way should be found to have those conversations in private.

    If you want to keep your job this is a very bad idea. Especially if you are a bloke. Yes sir, I really do keep taking these boys into my office in free time for chats about behaviour, honest.

     

  • Offline
    142
    Posted by: autismuk 17/12/2010 at 07:13
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,080

    DM:
    You keep banging on about the time you led a mathematics departement in a school earmarked for closure for just over one year.   We previously established you had 60 something children in your Year 11.   Your school presumably then had between 300 - 350 students on roll at the end?   I expect you taught at least 150 of them so I am guessing your Department consisted of you and one other full time teacher or you and a couple of part-timers?   This is hardly a wealth of middle management experience in my book.
     

    I've not read a single thing that weebecka has ever written that has given me any cause to think these classes were really challenging, or even moderately challenging.

    All her ideas - and to be fair to her on this thread she is far more direct about suggesting things - would work with middle level classes, but not in the sink schools.

     

  • Offline
    143
    Posted by: autismuk 17/12/2010 at 07:18
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,080

    Lilyofthefield:
    I too read "take child on to corridor for understanding chat with all the time in the world whilst the rest of the class may or may not get on with some work" and thought it best just to not even comment
     

    It wasn't even that until someone pointed out that this supposedly really behaviourally challenged class is unlikely to just get on with their work whilst you go out for the chat.

    Also the child put out in the corridor is the most .. upset / frazzled ... can't remember the exact phrase used, but the idea was this was the one upset or disturbed the most, not the problem causer. 

    Four obvious issues arise. One, the "upset" child is hardly likely to be pleased about being sent out when the causer is left in class. Two, the causer is still in the class and is unlikely to suddenly start working independently. Three, the "upset" child may well not wait for you to calm the class down, especially if they are fed up with being sent out. Four, the causer seems to have got away with it.

     

  • Offline
    144
    Posted by: airy 17/12/2010 at 07:20
    Joined on 18/11/2009
    Posts 29,467
    weebecka:
    I've worked in two schools where most of the classes were this bad at first. 
    Weebecka, what I am trying to get across to you was that this wasn't an exceptional class. No assault, swearing directed at each other rather than teacher, no particular support needs and pretty bright - although not always in an academic way. The solutions you describe sound like they would work with nice kids who had been let go a bit and as a supply teacher I've taken over classes like that who just needed a bit of consistency, to know the learning was relevant to them and to know their teacher cared a bit about what happened to them. I've "tamed" classes with a reputation just by learning their names really quickly...but...those weren't really bad classes to start off with. I suspect from what you say that latter group are the kind you talk about, the kind who can be brought round with a wee chat, some stickers and anything other than copying off the board or answering questions as work.
  • Offline
    145
    Posted by: autismuk 17/12/2010 at 07:22
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,080

    weebecka:
    I did nearly two years at Ehenside (I was invovled and sorting stuff out in the term before I started, actully I was in before the summer too).  I also had a diverse range of formal and informal responsbility in previous schools. My students have delivered very good results in very difficult circumstances.  There you go - that's my experience, no more no less.
     

    The problem for you Rebecca is no one believes you

    This is for lots of reasons but primarily :

    (1) anyone involved with remotely difficult children can see your ideas are virtually all unworkable or at best questionable

    (2) you weren't up front about your reasons for being on the TES forum.

     

  • Offline
    146
    Posted by: airy 17/12/2010 at 07:23
    Joined on 18/11/2009
    Posts 29,467
    Lilyofthefield:
    Airy, you must be getting a serious case of deja vu by now.
    I'm not sure why I'm bothering.
  • Offline
    147
    Posted by: Phoenixchild 17/12/2010 at 08:02
    Joined on 27/10/2005
    Posts 10,525

     As a slight aside, is it only me who has a problem with rewarding badly behaved children who show instances of good behaviour?

    What about the children who are always well behaved? What message are we giving them?

    Good behaviour should surely be an expectation not an achievement to be rewarded?

    And again, what about the poor kids who always behave?

    Sorry to thread crash but this really bothers me.xx

  • Offline
    148
    Posted by: airy 17/12/2010 at 08:06
    Joined on 18/11/2009
    Posts 29,467
    Phoenixchild:
    As a slight aside, is it only me who has a problem with rewarding badly behaved children who show instances of good behaviour?
    No. I try really hard to recognise the good kids as well as the others - it's something that can really alienate the nice kids in a class if you don't.
  • Offline
    149
    Posted by: autismuk 17/12/2010 at 09:32
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,080

    airy:
    Phoenixchild:
    As a slight aside, is it only me who has a problem with rewarding badly behaved children who show instances of good behaviour?
    No. I try really hard to recognise the good kids as well as the others - it's something that can really alienate the nice kids in a class if you don't.
     

    Me neither:

    "weebecka:Expected modifications in behaviour should be small and frequently rewarded.

    Small behavioural changes in very challenging classes are not going to set the world on fire, and then you get into the 'well-done-Ryan-for-not-hitting-anyone-for-10-minutes-heres-a-prize' issue."

     

  • Offline
    150
    Posted by: autismuk 17/12/2010 at 10:02
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,080

    weebecka:

    airy:
    weebecka:
    Don't believe all the stuff Autismuk writes about me passing classes like this on to SENCOS.  That's just him.  I said in some cases where it was best for the students I've put them with SENCOs.
    I was there when you posted about it. I don't need to rely on Autismuk for anything.
     

    Then I'm just lost, because I know who I am and what I did and somehow you've got the wrong impression.  Could you give me the post numbers?

     

    Post 294:

    "I suspect it might be different in the kinds of bottom sets which I hand over to my SENCO which have combined behavioural and SEN difficulties"

    Post 310:

    "I've sometimes organised year groups so that a SENCO or pair of TAs have take a bottom groups where this has been an appropriate strategy.  This wasn't appropriate for these groups because they all comprised a wide spread of attainment and a SENCO couldn't have coped with this in mathematics"

    ..... and for information, the definition of 'seriously probematic' (if anyone is wondering what the 'Borderline C' comments are about)

    Post 1111:

    "Class of 28 y11s.  2asbos, 1done for ABH.  Plenty of other seriously problematic students in there.  Borderline C grade GCSE class, essential for school statistics."

    (Before anyone says it, I'm not irredeemably sad and spend hours looking for them, I've just got tricks for these things that most people don't know about)

    All these are from 'Poor behaviour = poor teaching' thread.

    http://community.tes.co.uk/forums/t/450623.aspx

     

Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums