|
Whilst broadly agreeing with the main thrust of the replies from LotF, some aspects are worthy of debate. IMO. Lilyofthefield: But calling a casual "F*ck off" a verbal assault worthy of Police attention is just to diminish the seriousness of real assault and makes teachers look mincy and pathetic.
If I understand it, the OP is not posing the problems of a casual "F*ck off" (not that I condone it but, OK I can take some very limited abuse of this sort) but, as I remember repeated such "F*ck off".....s. X10 ? X100 ? The OP (I have just looked back) wasn´t on the last line above, nor maybe even the previous one, but many of us and many of the posters here are ! So what is to be done? LotF is both realistic and also (dare I say it?) Job´s comfortor when she continues. Lilyofthefield:Persistent flouting of any school rule should result in the eventual exclusion of the child. Because the government has nowhere to put them (hey, apart from our school!) they they simply made it harder to exclude them.
and Lilyofthefield:We have had our own dedicated Police Officer at this school for years, and ..... he is as hamstrung by the meagre sanctions available as the teaching staff are.
As for the "sticks and stones" argument, if this is true why is abusive language in a public place an arrestable offence as mentioned previously by Gary? Going back to the very first year when I started teaching, I remember a colleague who started out with me and others that year arguing "No matter how pressured their lives, none of these difficult kids would dream of walking in front of a speeding bus because they know the consequences."
|