Forums

"Michael Gove: my revolution for culture in classroom" - ravings of a lunatic?

Last post 03/01/11 at 12:33 by seren_dipity, 204 replies
Post started by FolkFan on 28/12/10 at 18:36

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    41
    Posted by: Fran Carpenter 29/12/2010 at 19:41
    Joined on 11/04/2002
    Posts 199
    soapboxgirl:
    we need Mr Laws back! Gove is a complete idiot
    Mr Laws was in the treasury, not in the education department. He never did anything great for education.
  • Offline
    42
    Posted by: sideshow 29/12/2010 at 19:47
    Joined on 11/06/2003
    Posts 63,056
    I think that Laws was the education spokes man for the Lib Dems... he was a big tip for a proper cabinet job...
  • Offline
    43
    Posted by: oldandrew 29/12/2010 at 19:47
    Joined on 08/01/2006
    Posts 5,490

    spiz:

    I know a few people who have visited colleges and universities in China.   The common report is that Chinese education is about 90% theory and only 10% practical, despite state of the art facilities for learning.    The curriculum managers out there don't trust the students to work independently or think for themselves - the students learn by rote what the teachers tell them.

    Are these the standards Gove wants to re-establish in England and Wales?

     

    I continue be amused at the way people keep slagging off Chinese education for their methods not their results.

    Can people not get their heads around the idea that what they are doing, even if it would never appeal to OFSTED, actually works better than what we do? Obviously, there is more to learning than rote memorisation but no education system ever failed because its students knew too much. We seem to have gone to such an extreme that we can't seem to even acknowledge that there is even a balance to be struck, let alone consider the possibility that a country at the other end of the spectrum might actually have struck it better than we have.

  • Offline
    44
    Posted by: shalteir 29/12/2010 at 20:08
    Joined on 07/02/2009
    Posts 1,064

     I don't know about Chinese education directly, but as written above, I'd say the merit or otherwise will be in the actual results and effectiveness of the Chinese students when they enter the workforce.

  • Offline
    45
    Posted by: oldandrew 29/12/2010 at 20:13
    Joined on 08/01/2006
    Posts 5,490

    shalteir:
    Apologies, OldAndrew, that was not what you were getting at.
     

    Any chance you can answer what I was getting at, i.e. how you cope with questions like that if your times tables aren't up to scratch?

  • Offline
    46
    Posted by: weebecka 29/12/2010 at 20:26
    Joined on 15/09/2010
    Posts 823

    oldandrew:
    I continue be amused at the way people keep slagging off Chinese education for their methods not their results.
     

    Personally I'm not slagging off the Chinese system at all.  There are certainly specific things we could learn from it and integrate into our system.

    In particular, Oldandrew, chinese teachers seem to know and to explicitly teach more effective models for multiplication than we do.  If you PM me on this I'll try and dig you out the relevant academic papers on this.  

    What I am having a go at here is the sheer ignorance of Gove's understanding as to which aspects of Chinese education it may be possible to learn from and which it may not.

    This very obviously due to the fact that he has only a stunningly superficial understanding of English education and so has no idea as to how it could sensibly and efficiently evolve.

  • Offline
    47
    Posted by: shalteir 29/12/2010 at 20:37
    Joined on 07/02/2009
    Posts 1,064

     No I can't.I agree with your point.

    In curiosity, I put your question on a search engine, like many students do, in the "modern way to solve problems", and was amazed to see it come up on a page.

    I don't have your maths expertise, but do have Ad Dip in Ed (maths), at primary level I  taught maths to a deep level of understanding for KS2. Pre NC, about 100% of my Y4 knew their tables by Easter, and applied this confidently to the work in hand. Not many years ago, few Y6 I've taught on supply had that same knowledge of tables, (but the last few years corrections have been made to expectations).  

    I very much remember, summer term, after doing multiplication, the class did a school assembly on the subject, and individuals in the low ability group challenged the audience to  produce two numbers between 11 and 19, then promptly without written aid, multiplied these mentally. The top group created maybe 20+ ways to solve a multiplication of TU x TU eg 21 x 25. To this day, I think most Y6 would be hard pressed to do that in class let alone live in front of a whole audience.

     

     

     

  • Offline
    48
    Posted by: oldandrew 29/12/2010 at 21:15
    Joined on 08/01/2006
    Posts 5,490

    shalteir:
     No I can't.I agree with your point.
     

    Sorry, I lost track of who the question was originally aimed at.

  • Offline
    49
    Posted by: sideshow 29/12/2010 at 21:42
    Joined on 11/06/2003
    Posts 63,056
    The quadradtic equations proves what you are going against! you say that you have to remember facts. NO! I don't know my times tables that well either, but I do know HOW TO WORK THEM OUT... so I can work out that it has to be something to do with 7 and 8 as the answers... the only way to do that by rote is to remember the x = -b - or + square root etc. To be honest I learnt how to do simultaneous equations aged 6 without help of my teachers doing puzzle books... no one got me to remember stuff. Thinking skills. If you don't think that there are real thinking skills Andrew, then you are just plain wrong, there are explicit thinking skills in my subject that you can relate to all thing that you learn. There is no point in remembering everything, understanding how to work it out is more important and we need to encourage unique ways in doing this to encourage innovation and creativity. To do this students need to discuss their work... think about their thnking. metacognition.
  • Offline
    50
    Posted by: shalteir 29/12/2010 at 21:47
    Joined on 07/02/2009
    Posts 1,064

     I also agree with points made above too. Metacognition was my favourite word, rarely hear it now, good to hear it again.

Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums