bombaysapphire:Copies have been kept of some of the pulled threads
Yes autismuk did that didn't he. That makes him a forum adminstrator, doesn't it? So he could also restore the threads which he has my full explicit permission to do. Could you just remind me again what it is I'm supposed to be guilty of bombaysapphire? I know that my supposed 'abuse of an inspector' is constantly being referred to being a crime. But it was others (DM and Autismuk) who named her. All I did was to refer to some of the assualts on staff which happened as a consquence of her instructions. And to be honest I'd be perfectly happy for her to take whatever action it is you think she should take against me for those comments because any investigation will reveal much worse things which personally I have no desire to conceal (but I suspect others might). Then there was some playing around with usernames late one night when the abuse got seriously surreal. I undersand you found being referred to a 'bombay mix' instead of bombay sapphire deeply offensive and have apologised for it. You published my apology in conflict with the code of conduct on this site. I understand that you now feel further action is necessary for this crime and await with dubious amusement my punishment. In the context of abuse I have received of my username, the inappropriate manipulation of my avatar and, of course, the constant threats against me (such as those in this thread) I have to say you do seem just a little thin skinned. Oh no - I see more court action pending for the insult...... And curlygirly - I suggested one evening that you were guilty of projection and that your behaviour on this forum concerned me. It didn't seem compatible with the ofsted gradings of our leadership. I only did this on one occasion (you have done it to me many, many times) and yet you seem to be totally obsessed with this comment. If it's not true curlygirly, I do suggest you let it go rather than constantly drawing attention to it.
|