Forums

/ Subjects / Mathematics

weebecka:

Yes autismuk did that didn't he.  That makes him a forum adminstrator, doesn't it?

So he could also restore the threads which he has my full explicit permission to do.

See below.

weebecka:

I know that my supposed 'abuse of an inspector' is constantly being referred to being a crime.  But it was others (DM and Autismuk) who named her.  All I did was to refer to some of the assualts on staff which happened as a consquence of her instructions. 

If you like Becka I'll repost the comments you made about her where you named her directly.

Here's a sample: You wrote this on 2nd January at 19:21 on the "Michael Gove: revolution" tread.

"How kind of you to like like this Autismuk.  Now why would you do that?  

Curlygirly posted this lie too.  Why did she do that?

My lessons have been graded outstanding during external observation Autismuk and I received only positive comments in the HMI reports. I have never had bad feedback, just some bizarrely questionable feedback which has made it apparant that the inspector has had no insight into what was going on in my classroom.  However I have seen many other seriously able teachers' health and careers destroyed by judgements during external inspections.

J--- J---- HMI (chief inspector for maths) is the inspector to whom we are both referring.  You seem to have forgotten her name.

Would you like me to tell you more about the consequences of her intervention at Ehenside Autismuk?  I know some were angry that I mentioned her name but they should understand there is so much I could have said and didn't. However if you or others keep raising her or lying about my observation judgements then I will assume that means you want me to publish more"

Of course, your claim rather begs the question as to how did either DM or myself know the name of the person who was your HMI at your school ?

autismuk:

No. All I do is automate the process of reading the threads the same way that you do, and archiving the results. This (below) was the very first one I wrote which just simply downloads a single thread, the mark 2 version downloads and automatically zips every thread to which you have contributed. (currently 179, not including deletions). It does not require administrator access.

import os
thread = "http://community.tes.co.uk/forums/t/461467.aspx"
pages = 18
for page in range(1,pages+1):
_print "Reading page "+str(page)
_cmd = "wget "+thread+"?PageIndex="+str(page)+" -O page"+str(page)+".html"
_os.system(cmd)

Replace leading underscores with spaces, it's Python.

ooh no - I don't automate anything.  Thanks for this

curlygirly:

Has anyone else seen any other poster abuse weebecka's username?

She is sometimes referred to as Becka, or occasionally by her real name. 

curlygirly:

I'm not sure how weebecka thinks anyone has manipulated her avatar. Surely she is the only person who can change this. Or is this a more serious accusation that her account has somehow Bern hacked?

Depends on her password. It might be something guessable, in which case you could change the avatar and so on.

But it's probably not true, and it's trivial to change it back. 

If anyone had hacked her a/c they haven't bothered to change her password so she's locked out.If someone had changed the avatar then it is obvious and the first thing any sensible person would do is change their password.So if someone did hack her they only wanted it as a one-shot, basically.

Or she's just talking rubbish as usual, more likely. 

I don't understand why anyone would bother. I only archive stuff because I can do it easily and because of her legal / ministerial threats. 

(and because I can have fun quoting her own posts back at her, of course)

weebecka:

curlygirly:

You seem to have "forgotten" that we all saw you do this. The administrators will no doubt have the original post archived and will be able to prove this should the need arise.

Great curlygirly but where?  Soon after DM quoted me as having named this inspector I searched and searched and couldn't find the post to which it was supposed to refer.  I hadn't had anything like that deleted and all the old threads were still standing at that stage.  I did once refer to her by name after others had but not in an abusive way - quite the opposite.

I'm not out to avoid anything I've done  - If I've done something wrong I'd rather know what it is so I can make amends. I'm also not out to wrongly accuse others.