Forums

"Poor Behaviour == Poor Teaching" thread has disappeared.

Last post 30/12/10 at 23:36 by sideshow, 159 replies
Post started by autismuk on 27/12/10 at 18:47

Rate this topic

Select colour:
  • Offline
    91
    Posted by: airy 29/12/2010 at 09:29
    Joined on 18/11/2009
    Posts 29,467
    weebecka:
    DM and has been systematically agitating things, distorting what I said and advising me badly and I'm interested to see why. 
    I can't speak for DM, but I will say that his advice was initially sound and quite generous in the circumstances. Nobody is agitating or distorting what you said. I read the posts. I saw that your attempts at facilitation were second rate and that the classroom management advice you doled out on the back of your experience in transforming a maths department was based on some rather flawed principles. Turn it into a witch hunt if it makes you feel better but the truth is you misjudged and misled your audience, gave advice likely to send new teachers quietly insane and did all these things with an attitude that you were here to save TES and save teaching.
  • Offline
    92
    Posted by: weebecka 29/12/2010 at 10:35
    Joined on 15/09/2010
    Posts 823

    airy:
    Nobody is agitating or distorting what you said
     

    Are you suggesting that noboday was agitating or distorting Airy?  Really?

     

    airy:
    I saw that your attempts at facilitation were second rate

    Absolutely.  I agree.  Actually I wasn't trying to facilitate at all I was just trying to survive, as is normal when you're getting the hang of a challenging new forum.

    airy:
    the classroom management advice you doled out on the back of your experience in transforming a maths department was based on some rather flawed principles

    All I did, airy, was to try to answer the questions.  I repeatedly emphasised that I was in no way claiming to be a behaviour expert or trying to advise others.  I was just talking about how I sorted out nightmare classes.  What I was saying was always always lost by blast of posts after it making ludicrous and distorting comments.  It was also a big problem that i was moderated, so a lot of the explanations I did give were lost as they appeared on pages people had alread read.

    I'm not saying I didn't make mistakes - of course I did and I would like to apologies for offence caused.  But I am very clearly suggesting that you guys that you need to be more considerate of the problems new posters have which you don't seem to understand or allow for. 

    airy:
    the truth is....you were here to save TES

    ???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! now that's one I haven't heard yet.  Doubtless there will be plenty more.

     

     

     

     

  • Offline
    93
    Posted by: seren_dipity 29/12/2010 at 10:46
    Joined on 29/10/2005
    Posts 43,478

    weebecka:
    Absolutely.  I agree.  Actually I wasn't trying to facilitate at all I was just trying to survive, as is normal when you're getting the hang of a challenging new forum.
     

    Oh, come ON, weebecka - you stated on more than one occasion that you were here to facilitate us because despite thousands of discussions we weren't solving anything here and discussions weren't sufficiently in-depth.  You told us all of your extensive expertise in facilitation and your extensive experience in a number of other forums.  You've also failed to notice that this is a highly effective community and, having had it pointed out to you, have failed to acknowledge your mistake and, instead, made silly sarcastic comments about it.

    weebecka:
    But I am very clearly suggesting that you guys that you need to be more considerate of the problems new posters have which you don't seem to understand or allow for. 

    Most new posters aren't here to facilitate us or help TES become a better forum.  We were all new once and some of us (me for one) make mistakes when we start posting.  Most, however, would learn from those mistakes.

    Know your audience, weebecka.  If you're such an expert on forums you ought to know that.

     

  • Offline
    94
    Posted by: weebecka 29/12/2010 at 11:05
    Joined on 15/09/2010
    Posts 823

    seren_dipity:
    You've also failed to notice that this is a highly effective community and, having had it pointed out to you, have failed to acknowledge your mistake ...
     

    This is a very highly effectively community for quick transactional questions.  I've said this many times and have certainly never contradicted this as it obviously true.

    I have on many occasions question how good it is at dealing with deeper issues.  There is clearly a tendancy here for people to repeatedly post dogmatic views at each other without exploring the specific experiences which give validity to each view point and the deeper communilities and differences between them.

    However I've said it before and I'll say it again - what I want you do do is to prove me wrong - to post me links to the conversations which contradict my assumptions.   I'm sure you've noticed I'm also trying to create such conversations myself now I've settled in so am doing my best to prove myself wrong.  Surely you can help me do that! 

    And even if we can't and my prior assumptions are correct, TES remains in my view, of course, a highly effective community.  

  • Online
    95
    Posted by: DM 29/12/2010 at 11:09
    Joined on 12/05/2003
    Posts 5,309

    inky:
    Someone - heaven knows who - used the word acronym incorrectly.  That really irritated me. 

    Oh was that me?

    DM:

    weebecka:
    Let me guess - you contributed to the EiML materials then.

    I don't even know what that acronym means so no.

    Should it say "I don't even know the meaning of that acronym?   I don't actually know!
  • Offline
    96
    Posted by: poemeelectronique 29/12/2010 at 11:11
    Joined on 06/09/2008
    Posts 2,285

    weebecka:

    This is a very highly effectively community for quick transactional questions.  I've said this many times and have certainly never contradicted this as it obviously true.

    I have on many occasions question how good it is at dealing with deeper issues.  There is clearly a tendancy here for people to repeatedly post dogmatic views at each other without exploring the specific experiences which give validity to each view point and the deeper communilities and differences between them.

    However I've said it before and I'll say it again - what I want you do do is to prove me wrong - to post me links to the conversations which contradict my assumptions.   I'm sure you've noticed I'm also trying to create such conversations myself now I've settled in so am doing my best to prove myself wrong.  Surely you can help me do that! 

    And even if we can't and my prior assumptions are correct, TES remains in my view, of course, a highly effective community.

    Sorry for butting in but TES is the way it is because of the people that post on it.  It hasn't changed significantly since I joined a couple of years ago. I don't understand why you'd join a forum that's been going, in the way it is, for a long time and try and exercise change or challenge the way it operates.  If you prefer deeper and more analytical discussions then perhaps this isn't the place to find it.  I think it's a bit "off" to try and make people do things differently when you're a newbie, tbh.

    You obviously won't be able to get tone of voice in my post - it's meant to be a genuine question, I'm puzzled that's all. 

  • Offline
    97
    Posted by: planetx 29/12/2010 at 11:14
    Joined on 11/09/2008
    Posts 3,816
    weebecka:
    There is clearly a tendancy here for people to repeatedly post dogmatic views at each other without exploring the specific experiences which give validity to each view point and the deeper communilities and differences between them.

    Which is your way of saying that everyone is dogmatic but you.

    You haven't actually noticed that people often send detailed assistance by email, often with a host of "me too"s. You just thought you knew best and are paying the price.

  • Online
    98
    Posted by: DM 29/12/2010 at 11:25
    Joined on 12/05/2003
    Posts 5,309

    weebecka:
    There are very few people I've annoyed in the maths teaching community, but the people who wrote the Excellence in Maths Leadership Materials for the NCETM.

    I think you underestimate how many mathematics teachers you have upset on here weebs.  

    What was wrong with these EiML materials in the first place?   Even if they weren't very good, I can imagine if you pointed out their shortcomings with your usual tact, that might not have been well received.

    Please stop saying I have advised you badly.   The only advice I have ever given to you is to stop being so confrontational and bigheaded and be careful about revealing your identity.   You completely ignored every aspect of my "advice" so if you haven't enjoyed the consequences, it is your own fault.

    Could you stop mentioning Mark now as he probably wouldn't want to Google his name and end up here!? 
  • Offline
    99
    Posted by: seren_dipity 29/12/2010 at 11:40
    Joined on 29/10/2005
    Posts 43,478

    weebecka:
    This is a very highly effectively community for quick transactional questions.  I've said this many times and have certainly never contradicted this as it obviously true.
     

    Oh, obviously.

    I've been posting for 5 years and wouldn't dream of attempting to sum up the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of threads so glibly. 

    Apart from the fact that you cannot possibly know the contents of every thread why is it that you believe that 'quick transactional questions' are in some way wrong?  Why do you feel the need to change a site that's been running for about ten years without your assistance?  

    weebecka:
    I have on many occasions question how good it is at dealing with deeper issues.  There is clearly a tendancy here for people to repeatedly post dogmatic views at each other without exploring the specific experiences which give validity to each view point and the deeper communilities and differences between them.

    Really?  How much research did you put into reaching this conclusion?  I think many of us are perfectly aware of the specific experiences of others - as a result of having many, many discussions with them.  You, however, were totally unaware of the experiences of others when you 'lectured' them on various subjects - and even on discovering those specific experiences either wrote them off (being Scottish for example) or did a runner in order not to acknowledge their at least equal (if not superior) knowledge and experience.

    weebecka:
    However I've said it before and I'll say it again - what I want you do do is to prove me wrong - to post me links to the conversations which contradict my assumptions. 

    Out of tens of thousands of conversations on here?  Maybe they exist, maybe they don't.  That isn't the point though - the point is that you seem to think they need to exist.

    Let's assume you are correct - have you any sense of a significant group of posters hailing your attempt to create such conversations?  Any sense that TES requires there to be such conversations?  Any sense that posters want such conversations?

    weebecka:
    I'm sure you've noticed I'm also trying to create such conversations myself now I've settled in so am doing my best to prove myself wrong.  Surely you can help me do that! 

    The same response to both points - why?

    weebecka:
    And even if we can't and my prior assumptions are correct, TES remains in my view, of course, a highly effective community.  

    Even if we can't what?

    I do hope you correct your statement elsewhere about TES's lack of community.

     

     

     

     

  • Online
    100
    Posted by: DM 29/12/2010 at 11:45
    Joined on 12/05/2003
    Posts 5,309

    seren_dipity:

    I do hope you correct your statement elsewhere about TES's lack of community.

    I'd just like her to apologise, sincerely, for her behaviour since she joined TES.   If she did so, I, for one, would be happy to draw a line under this whole sorry episode.

Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums