weebecka:This is a very highly effectively community for quick transactional questions. I've said this many times and have certainly never contradicted this as it obviously true. Oh, obviously. I've been posting for 5 years and wouldn't dream of attempting to sum up the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of threads so glibly. Apart from the fact that you cannot possibly know the contents of every thread why is it that you believe that 'quick transactional questions' are in some way wrong? Why do you feel the need to change a site that's been running for about ten years without your assistance? weebecka:I have on many occasions question how good it is at dealing with deeper issues. There is clearly a tendancy here for people to repeatedly post dogmatic views at each other without exploring the specific experiences which give validity to each view point and the deeper communilities and differences between them.
Really? How much research did you put into reaching this conclusion? I think many of us are perfectly aware of the specific experiences of others - as a result of having many, many discussions with them. You, however, were totally unaware of the experiences of others when you 'lectured' them on various subjects - and even on discovering those specific experiences either wrote them off (being Scottish for example) or did a runner in order not to acknowledge their at least equal (if not superior) knowledge and experience. weebecka:However I've said it before and I'll say it again - what I want you do do is to prove me wrong - to post me links to the conversations which contradict my assumptions.
Out of tens of thousands of conversations on here? Maybe they exist, maybe they don't. That isn't the point though - the point is that you seem to think they need to exist. Let's assume you are correct - have you any sense of a significant group of posters hailing your attempt to create such conversations? Any sense that TES requires there to be such conversations? Any sense that posters want such conversations? weebecka: I'm sure you've noticed I'm also trying to create such conversations myself now I've settled in so am doing my best to prove myself wrong. Surely you can help me do that!
The same response to both points - why? weebecka:And even if we can't and my prior assumptions are correct, TES remains in my view, of course, a highly effective community.
Even if we can't what? I do hope you correct your statement elsewhere about TES's lack of community.
|