Site search

Forums
/ Subjects / Mathematics

"Stick to the topic when posting a message."

Last post 26/01/11 at 19:50 by curlygirly, 175 replies
Post started by Nazard on 22/01/11 at 09:19

Rate this topic

All Topics
Select colour:

All TES forums

Subject

Stage

Role

FE

Career

Whole school

Scotland

TES Cymru

Lifestyle

  • jabed avatar
    Online
    141
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 11:41
    Reply
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    googolplex:
    jabed:
    >I think its time this was knocked on the head.
    The time for that has long since past...

     

    Thanks for the support there.Yes
  • autismuk avatar
    Offline
    142
    Posted by: autismuk 26/01/2011 at 11:41
    Reply
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,570

    jabed:

    autismuk:

    Becca is also a comically blatant liar who refuses to admit any fault or error at all, relying on fantasies about posts being deleted and changed by some miraculous method to preserve her own little ego.

    There are many others here who seem fit that description too.  None of them seem to be banned either.

     

    I've already pointed out the likely reasons for her banning - arguing and posting mods PMs ; libelling people.

    The Mods aren't too bothered about loony posters, as long as it doesn't go too far.

  • jabed avatar
    Online
    143
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 11:44
    Reply
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    autismuk:

    I've already pointed out the likely reasons for her banning - arguing and posting mods PMs ; libelling people.

    The Mods aren't too bothered about loony posters, as long as it doesn't go too far

    The apparent fact remains - there was no banning. That is all I am pointing out.

  • curlygirly avatar
    Offline
    144
    Posted by: curlygirly 26/01/2011 at 11:47
    Reply
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 5,328

    jabed:
    a) there was never at any time a banning of said poster

    So how come we had emails saying she was.

    And how come Weebecka herself said that she was here:

     

    weebecka:

     Smile

    Being banned is interesting you know.

    It gives you a chance to do other things.

    Oh dear I have a horrible sinking feeling about this thread..... (and my surprising current un-banned-ness.....).

     

    and here:

    weebecka:
    Mark one of the worst things about being banned was not getting the opportunity to reply to this message from Saturday afternoon.!

     

    and here:

    weebecka:
    Curlygirly I still have no information regarding either why I was banned or why I have been reinstated.

    Weebecka herself has admitted 3 times in this thread that she was banned. Are you saying she's lying?

     

    jabed:
    Let me be clear though, I am not asking or even trying to pressurize any poster into sending or publishing an e mail. I do not care about it.

     

    Possibly because it will be additional evidence (if any were needed, the above posts make it pretty clear) that she was, in fact, banned?
  • googolplex avatar
    Offline
    145
    Posted by: googolplex 26/01/2011 at 11:49
    Reply
    Joined on 17/07/2009
    Posts 122
    autismuk:

    googolplex:
    jabed:
    >I think its time this was knocked on the head.
    The time for that has long since past...
     

    Becca has requested reboots in the past. Whilst her laughably insane conspiracy theories about gangs of roaming TES posters enforcing a right wing agenda and advising Michael Gove are insane (a majority are left I think, and all have concerns about some of Gove's policies) they are also annoying.

    Becca is also a comically blatant liar who refuses to admit any fault or error at all, relying on fantasies about posts being deleted and changed by some miraculous method to preserve her own little ego.

    Ok. I'm steering clear of offering an opinion on that. But seriously, you lot are worse than a bunch of squabbling Year 8s... "He hit me." "He hit me first..."
  • curlygirly avatar
    Offline
    146
    Posted by: curlygirly 26/01/2011 at 11:52
    Reply
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 5,328

    jabed:

    The apparent fact remains - there was no banning. That is all I am pointing out.

     

    So why has weebecka herself referred, 3 times in this thread alone, to her banning ?
  • jabed avatar
    Online
    147
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 11:54
    Reply
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    Whilst I am on a roll here  and it does go back to the original topic of this thread. Is it possible for some posters to  consider the use of language please? I find it offensive to see the use of such words as " loony", "bam"   " barmy"  and  other such references to mental health/ illness.

    They are intended as a vile devaluing of an individual and that is always clear. But it is  seriously unfunny.  It also classes as a pet hate of mine and I  find anyone needing to speak that way lacking credibility frankly.

     None of them are accurate descriptions.   I cant see a need  to be uncivil at any time.

     I have to go to work.

  • jabed avatar
    Online
    148
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 11:56
    Reply
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    curlygirly:

    jabed:

    The apparent fact remains - there was no banning. That is all I am pointing out.

     

    So why has weebecka herself referred, 3 times in this thread alone, to her banning ?

    I suspect because , like the rest of us, she read your comment and believed it.  As she said, she had no other indication of being banned and there was no evidence for it on TES.  I believed you too, until I looked and checked.

  • curlygirly avatar
    Offline
    149
    Posted by: curlygirly 26/01/2011 at 12:02
    Reply
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 5,328

    jabed:

    curlygirly:

    jabed:

    The apparent fact remains - there was no banning. That is all I am pointing out.

     

    So why has weebecka herself referred, 3 times in this thread alone, to her banning ?

    I suspect because , like the rest of us, she read your comment and believed it.  As she said, she had no other indication of being banned and there was no evidence for it on TES.  I believed you too, until I looked and checked.

    Or maybe because she knows she was.

    How do you explain her absence for hours, when she's posted pretty continually over the last few weeks?

    She would've been trying to get on for all that time and failing, because she was, as I was informed in my email, banned.

    We were all able to access TES in the time that she was absent, but she wasn't, she states herself that she was banned, 3 times in the post. But you say she wasn't?

    One would question how you can make such a statement with absolute certainty.

    Perhaps ne of the moderators would care to clarify here?
  • curlygirly avatar
    Offline
    150
    Posted by: curlygirly 26/01/2011 at 12:06
    Reply
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 5,328

    jabed:
    I believed you too, until I looked and checked.

    Can you do me a favour and explain how you "checked" because you're obviously much more au fait with the workings of TES than I am, I'd be interested to do this myself, as the email I have which was sent on the 22nd January at 16.27 tells me that the user has been banned.

    Interestingly there are no posts from weebecka at all after that, until yesterday.

     
Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums