Forums

"Stick to the topic when posting a message."

Last post 26/01/11 at 19:50 by curlygirly, 175 replies
Post started by Nazard on 22/01/11 at 09:19

Rate this topic

Select colour:

All TES forums

  • Online
    171
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 19:27
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    Betamale:

    jabed:

     I have to go to work.

    Out of interest, is that as a mathematics teacher?

    Of your 75 or so posts (as I make this post) I cannot find many that actually relate to mathematics or its teaching....oh 'my bad' there was the one where you teach G grade GCSE students A level maths.....

    time line

    Becka the Clown arrives > talks trash > gets in hot water > 'disappears' > you appear and manage to post more on some deluded e-pedagogy-expert than anything else

    Is Eastenders sh**te at the moment?

    Can we do more realistic maths chat?

     

     

    I think I commented earlier that I have a maths degree and I teach statistics at A level.  I am not sure why you need to ask since I only said it a week ago.  I  also commented at that time  that I was watching before posting more on maths because I was concerned about responses,  given what I had witnessed , including  similar ones to yours above.

    I have posted one thread on maths ( about maths teaching) and I cannot say how many posts I contributed.  A handful on that thread.  I did say, although I am not sure it was central to the posting that I had one student with a grade G in maths in my class  and several with D.  Other than that I have posted on behaviour, pay and conditions and  opinion in probably equal numbers. But I am sure you can do a search and look that up and be more accurate than I. I am not much of a thread starter really. I prefer to see something and consider whether I can make a useful contribution.  I tested the maths forum out with that one thread. I did not find it unpleasant and may be encouraged to post further ( or not if you want to take issue with me?).

    I was around before WB and posting. I do not watch Eastenders. Will that be enough?

    I would love to engage anyone who wants to  chat about maths. However, forgive me if I slowly test the water before making too many posts on that.  Meanwhile, this is yet another off topic post to add to my number count.

     

  • Online
    172
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 19:33
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    seren_dipity:

    weebecka:
    You quoted me as having done that on this forum. I've no idea how you constructed your post to made it look like I'd criticised an inspector on this forum but you did and I haven't.
     

    This is a blatant lie.

    weebecka:
    I have no desire to criticise individual inspectors.

    And yet you did.  Repeatedly.  

     

    It's a complete mystery to me why you think you can pretend you didn't and that you might convince many posters that they did not read what they read.

    weebecka:
    you continue to spout lies about me unsanctioned.

    You take lying to dizzying new heights even for TES.

     


    Rather than just " sloppy writing"  of course.

     There are lies, damn lies and statistics and  now we can add sloppy writing to the list.  I dont believe any of you.

  • Online
    173
    Posted by: autismuk 26/01/2011 at 19:33
    Joined on 05/02/2005
    Posts 7,571

    weebecka:
    TES have my full permission to publish everything as I have said many times. As you know I have written to them repeatedly asking for the deleted threads to be reposted.
     

    You stupid ***. They aren't going to put posts back or republish possible libels - how would that look in a Libel court if JJ or HMI sued you and/or the TES's owners ?

    "Well, we thought they were wrong so we took them off, but Becka asked for them to be put back, so we did".  Moderators, say hello to the sack.

    weebecka:
    I recognised that there is no point in reporting either of your lies or abuse as you remain unsanctioned.

    As TES probably archive posts (deleted in computing terms doesn't actually mean they are gone you know) in case of action, and read the posts that were deleted, they know what those posts said. 

    As you posted your PM exchange with them "Please put the posts back now" they undoubtedly think you're mad anyway.

    Please report this post. I'm sure they will agree with my view that you are a stupid ***. You clearly have no idea about the problems you could cause for them, despite it being pointed out to you repeatedly (they've probably done it as well). 

     

  • Online
    174
    Posted by: jabed 26/01/2011 at 19:40
    Joined on 16/05/2010
    Posts 81

    curlygirly:

    Can you do me a favour and explain how you "checked" because you're obviously much more au fait with the workings of TES than I am, I'd be interested to do this myself, as the email I have which was sent on the 22nd January at 16.27 tells me that the user has been banned.

    Interestingly there are no posts from weebecka at all after that, until yesterday.

    It  isn't rocket science. It doesn't even require great IT literacy or much of an understanding regarding the working of TES.   Simply click on the name of the poster and you arrive at their profile page. On that page it states whether the poster is banned.

     At no time over the weekend  following your claim that a poster had been baned or any time since was there any indication on that profile that you were correct. Your comment therefore was not supported by the available evidence.  I have never said more than that on the matter.

  • Offline
    175
    Posted by: seren_dipity 26/01/2011 at 19:49
    Joined on 29/10/2005
    Posts 43,810

    jabed:

    Rather than just " sloppy writing"  of course.

     There are lies, damn lies and statistics and  now we can add sloppy writing to the list.  I dont believe any of you.

     

    Try not to be stupid.

  • Online
    176
    Posted by: curlygirly 26/01/2011 at 19:50
    Joined on 06/02/2004
    Posts 5,328
    Err I think you'll find you said earlier on here that weebecka was not banned. You implied that I had made this up. Weebecka herself has posted on here several times to say that she was banned. Duh.
Back to top

Sign up – it’s free!

  • Don’t miss out on the latest jobs
  • Connect and share with friends
  • Download thousands of resources
  • Chat in the forums